API diff between .NET 11 Preview 6 and .NET 11 Preview 7 by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #10482 · dotnet/core

github-actions · 2026-07-18T23:22:32Z

Note

Incremental public API diff .NET 11 Preview 6 → .NET 11 Preview 7.

Draft — auto-maintained while .NET 11 Preview 7 is the in-development frontier.

Incremental diff: 11.0-preview.6 (11.0.0-preview.6.26359.118) → 11.0-preview.7 (11.0.0-preview.7.26366.102). Track: incremental.

How this was generated

Generated by the api-diff skill / RunApiDiff.ps1.

Previous: 11.0.0-preview.6.26359.118 @ https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/dotnet-public/nuget/v3/index.json
Current: 11.0.0-preview.7.26366.102 @ https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/dotnet11/nuget/v3/index.json
Generated at: 2026-07-24T13:55:47Z
Report count: 30 files

Status

in-development — this PR remains as a draft while .NET 11 Preview 7 is the in-development frontier on main.

Review checklist

Repo area owners

ASP.NET - @dotnet/aspnet-api-review
WinForms - @dotnet/dotnet-winforms (no changes)
WPF - @dotnet/wpf-developers @dotnet/dotnet-wpf-maintainers (no changes)
Runtime - @JulieLeeMSFT @steveisok @agocke @lewing
Libraries - @jeffhandley @SamMonoRT @karelz

Libraries area owners

Feedback applied

Temporary attribute exclusions (this diff only):

T:System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessageAttribute — excluded per reviewer request to suppress attribute property typo corrections from the diff (Microsoft.Extensions.Identity.Stores). The change in that file was a Justification string typo fix ("annoated" → "annotated"), not a real API change.

Permanent exclusions added this run: None.

Automation state

# api-diff:state:begin
# api-diff-marker: 11.0-preview.6_to_11.0-preview.7
track: "incremental"
previous-version-milestone: "11.0-preview.6"
current-version-milestone: "11.0-preview.7"
previous-version: "11.0.0-preview.6.26359.118"
current-version: "11.0.0-preview.7.26366.102"
previous-feed: "https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/dotnet-public/nuget/v3/index.json"
current-feed: "https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/dotnet11/nuget/v3/index.json"
status: "in-development"
report-count: 30
generated-at: "2026-07-24T13:55:47Z"
temporary-attributes-excluded: ["T:System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessageAttribute"]
# api-diff:state:end

Generated by API Diff Worker · 49.2 AIC · ⌖ 5.9 AIC · ⊞ 11.2K · ◷

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

azure-pipelines · 2026-07-18T23:22:40Z

Azure Pipelines: There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

svick · 2026-07-20T09:39:31Z

@jeffhandley The old workflow was to notify code owners with changes and ask them to check that the changes are correct. How is that going to work with this version?

jeffhandley · 2026-07-21T08:30:40Z

Previously, the worker created API-diff PRs as drafts and marked them Ready for Review only after the diff reached code-complete (when development had moved to the next major). It did not generate a review checklist or explicitly request the product and library-area owners; any reviewer requests followed the repository's normal CODEOWNERS behavior.

The new workflow changes retain that draft-to-ready transition and add a review checklist before the feedback section. It lists the repo owners and derives affected library-area owners from the live dotnet/runtime area-owners.md mapping. Existing open API-diff PRs will receive the revised body on their next daily run.

svick · 2026-07-23T15:03:48Z

@jeffhandley It looks like the agent got confused about how to use safeoutputs and so the PR description was not updated:

Warning: ⚠️ report_incomplete: update_pull_request limit exhausted before body refresh
Details: The first update_pull_request call was sent without the body (title-only), consuming the 1-per-run limit. The second call with the full body (including the new generated_at watermark 2026-07-23T13:56:37Z and review checklist) was rejected. The PR body still shows generated_at: 2026-07-22T13:56:21Z, so the watermark was not advanced. The next scheduled run will re-enter this metadata-only path.

Though if this is a rare problem and tomorrow's run is going to be fine, this might not be worth addressing.

jeffhandley · 2026-07-24T10:39:05Z

+-         [System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessageAttribute("Trimming", "IL2026:Members annotated with 'RequiresUnreferencedCodeAttribute' require dynamic access otherwise can break functionality when trimming application code", Justification = "TKey is annoated with RequiresUnreferencedCodeAttribute.All.")]
+         [System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessageAttribute("Trimming", "IL2026:Members annotated with 'RequiresUnreferencedCodeAttribute' require dynamic access otherwise can break functionality when trimming application code", Justification = "TKey is annotated with RequiresUnreferencedCodeAttribute.All.")]
+          public virtual TKey? ConvertIdFromString(string? id);
+      }
+      public abstract class UserStoreBase<TUser, TKey, TUserClaim, TUserLogin, TUserToken> : Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserLoginStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserStore<TUser>, System.IDisposable, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserClaimStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserPasswordStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserSecurityStampStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserEmailStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserLockoutStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserPhoneNumberStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IQueryableUserStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserTwoFactorStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserAuthenticationTokenStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserAuthenticatorKeyStore<TUser>, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IUserTwoFactorRecoveryCodeStore<TUser> where TUser : Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IdentityUser<TKey> where TKey : System.IEquatable<TKey> where TUserClaim : Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IdentityUserClaim<TKey>, new()
+        where TUserLogin : Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IdentityUserLogin<TKey>, new()
+        where TUserToken : Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.IdentityUserToken<TKey>, new()
+      {
+-         [System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessageAttribute("Trimming", "IL2026:Members annotated with 'RequiresUnreferencedCodeAttribute' require dynamic access otherwise can break functionality when trimming application code", Justification = "TKey is annoated with RequiresUnreferencedCodeAttribute.All.")]
+         [System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessageAttribute("Trimming", "IL2026:Members annotated with 'RequiresUnreferencedCodeAttribute' require dynamic access otherwise can break functionality when trimming application code", Justification = "TKey is annotated with RequiresUnreferencedCodeAttribute.All.")]
+          public virtual TKey? ConvertIdFromString(string? id);


Took me a minute to see that this is just fixing a typo: "annoated" --> "annotated"

Let's suppress these attribute property typo corrections from the diff.

github-actions · 2026-07-24T14:02:33Z

Commit pushed: 218d9c6

Generated by API Diff Worker · 49.2 AIC · ⌖ 5.9 AIC · ⊞ 11.2K

API diff 11.0-preview.6 -> 11.0-preview.7

b1455bd

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

github-actions Bot added automation Created by automated repository workflows/agents. api-diff labels Jul 18, 2026

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

jeffhandley mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2026

Improve API diff PR review workflow #10487

Merged

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

jeffhandley mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2026

Eliminate API diff PR comment noise #10493

Merged

jeffhandley reviewed Jul 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

API diff 11.0-preview.6 -> 11.0-preview.7

218d9c6

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

API diff between .NET 11 Preview 6 and .NET 11 Preview 7#10482

API diff between .NET 11 Preview 6 and .NET 11 Preview 7#10482
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
api-diff/11.0-preview.6_to_11.0-preview.7

github-actions Bot commented Jul 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines Bot commented Jul 18, 2026

Uh oh!

svick commented Jul 20, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

jeffhandley commented Jul 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

svick commented Jul 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

jeffhandley Jul 24, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

github-actions Bot commented Jul 18, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

How this was generated

Status

Review checklist

Repo area owners

Libraries area owners

Feedback applied

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines Bot commented Jul 18, 2026

Uh oh!

svick commented Jul 20, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

jeffhandley commented Jul 21, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

svick commented Jul 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

jeffhandley Jul 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

github-actions Bot commented Jul 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

jeffhandley commented Jul 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading

svick commented Jul 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading